From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Jan 09 2003 - 19:38:20 MST
--- Brett Paatsch <paatschb@ocean.com.au> wrote:
> Seems "the world" is still awaiting proof on two propositions :
>
> Notable, in the Clonaid case, is that around 11 days have passed
> since the birth of the alleged clone and no proof has been presented.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence....
Furthermore, if the Church of Government were intent on Inquisitioning
you for acting on such science (as was done 500 years ago in another
science that challenged the powers that be), you'd be circumspect about
offering up proof of your guilt.
>
> -----
>
> Meanwhile despite having 25,000 US troops in the Gulf and another
> 75,000 on the way, despite Britain and now apparently France
> preparing
> to send troops as well, the weapons inspectors have still not found
> any evidence of WMD, no evidence (at least that I have heard of)
> has been presented linking Hussein to terrorist acts since the last
> Gulf war.
Ditto on rules of evidence as above. There is in fact evidence of
concealment in that significant quantities of chemical and biotoxins
known to be in inventory in 1998 are not accounted for in Iraq's most
recent Declaration to the Security Council. They have disappeared from
the tally, and Iraq refuses to disclose what happened to them.
Just because someone hides something very well from you does not mean
it doesn't exist. If your ability to discover it is entirely dependent
upon their cooperation and disclosure, when they are not interested in
doing so, then you will never find what you are looking for.
>
> It seems that a whole lot of people are getting dressed up who are
> going to be very disappointed to have no place to go.
If you think they are not going anywhere, you are mistaken.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:35:51 MST