From: Dickey, Michael F (michael_f_dickey@groton.pfizer.com)
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 09:30:27 MST
MaxPlumm had asked me to forward this on his behalf...
> Jeff, ...I must
> take issue with a large portion of your argument.
<snip>
> http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/world/A0861793.html
>
> Note the following excerpt:
>
> In Mar., 1946, France signed an agreement with Ho
Chi
> Minh, recognizing Vietnam as a free state within the
> Indochina federation and the French Union. ..."
>
> # I find it fascinating that you, or more
> specifically your source, cut off
> the statement here. In full, it continues
****IT DOES NOT CONTINUE**** as you state. You cite
an entirely different source. Everyone makes
mistakes, but this subject is difficult enough without
blunt misattribution.
--------
Perhaps your understanding of the english language is lacking, Jeff, but
Webster's College Dictionary, Third Edition, defines statement as: "a
written
or spoken declaration". I am referring here to the DOCUMENT SIGNED BY HO CHI
MINH AND JEAN SAINTENY IN PARIS IN MARCH OF 1946. The website you use as as
ource quotes directly from this document. But it, and you, do not includet
he entire article of this document. The document does say, as you quote,
Ø In Mar., 1946, France signed an agreement with Ho
Chi
> Minh, recognizing Vietnam as a free state within the
> Indochina federation and the French Union. ..."
But then, THE DOCUMENT FROM WHICH THIS WEBSITE QUOTES CONTINUES ON THE VERYN
EXT LINE...
In that which concerns the reuniting of the three 'Annamite Regions'
(Cochinchina, Annam, Tonkin) the French Government pledges itself to ratifyt
he decisions taken BY THE POPULATIONS CONSULTED BY REFERENDUM.
That is article one of the document in its entirety. The entire document can
be found, among other places, in Frederik Logevall's "The Origins of the
Vietnam War", p. 100
So, once again, there were no such referendums ever held. Therefore, thisd
ocument is a dead letter. So, before you magically wave off an argument
that
challenges your position, let us be perfectly clear on this. I am quotingf
rom the document itself, not "some other source" as you claim. Are you
somehow suggesting that your website which edits the document takes
precedence over the document signed by Ho Chi Minh himself?
MaxPlumm
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:35:50 MST