Re: On Conscious Integers

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sun Jan 05 2003 - 15:38:40 MST


Ok. So its like a book, where information is archived. Still, unless you can
come up with a counter-example; this archiving is unconscious, unless a meat
and bone neuro system, such as myself; comprehends it. We imagine that we
can instill human level complexity into a metalic-electrical system (I hope
so too!) but we have yet no proper examples of this. Do we? Not at human
level anyway.

Thus, the integers themselves can not be conscious anymore then a plasma beam
can be conscious, or a brick, yes? More suscinctly, integers are 'things'
that (so far) only exist as such in a human nervous system (brain). Even
computers must 'view' integers as merely start-stop, on-off places. Therefore
can be considered as non-conscious by us meat things.

Mitch

Lee Corbin wrote:
<<This notion is extended to conscious integers.  A conscious
integer base 10, which can have fewer than a googolplex
digits, contains long portions that establish its isomorphic
meaning.  This is analogous to the picture on the space
vehicle that Sagen et. al. drew.  It encodes up enough
isomorphic meaning to be decipherable by intelligence
elsewhere in the universe.>>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:35:50 MST