HOLOCAUST Re: The Holocaust

Eugene Leitl (Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Sat, 28 Dec 1996 18:26:13 +0100 (MET)


On Fri, 27 Dec 1996, John K Clark wrote:

John, thank you for the citations.

> "I visited Treblinka to find out how they carried out exterminations. The
> camp commander at Treblinka told me he used [carbon] monoxide gas and I
> did not think his methods were very efficient. So when I set up the
> extermination building at Auschwitz I used Zyklon B which is crystallized
> prussic acid which we dropped into the death chamber from a small opening.

I think it is HCN absorbate on silica. HCN itself would have been much
too dangerous (18 deg C b.p.), its solution in water is instable.

I have seen these holes in the ceiling in Dachau btw., though they didn't
gass people there -- the installation was too new. And the average
village Kraut _really_ didn't knew -- the first time they saw
concentration campers was towards the end of the war, where advanced
Allies fronts caused them to hurry up with the coverups -- marching
columns in full daylight, shooting sick/exhausted people in the field.

> [...]
>
> The reason that cyanide, the gas given off by Zyklon B, is very popular in
> the termite killing business and very unpopular in the chemical warfare
> business is that it leaves no residue, it does not last and in fact is

Right, but it is also the chiefest advantage of HCN: after a day treated
terrain is passable. This doesn't happen with VX. Btw, anybody knows what
this Russian VX successor is, the one one order of magnitude better than VX?

> lighter than air. Unless it's confined in a building it becomes harmless
> almost immediately.

Apart from the other nasties, the effects of HCN are briefly treated in
"A Higher Form of Killing" by Robert Harris and Jeremy Paxman, 1982.

[...]

ciao,
'gene