> From: James Rogers
> This is sort of true, but not entirely. Assembly code, for example, was
a
> true improvement. ........
..
..
> I almost always get more
> development work done with a good text editor than with a fancy graphical
> environment.
>
> -James Rogers
> jamesr@best.com
>
James i feel like we are talking past each other. I don't doubt that the
best development tool right now for complex jobs is c++ or the like. All
i'm saying is that there must be a better way, and when we find that we can
develop even stronger tools and so on.
All your arguments have been used before when the change went from
assembler to c and from c to c++. They only last until the better tool show
up up and is being used by the majority of developers.
I don't think the thread will lead to anything new so i will pull out of it
before it gets to be a religious debate.
I will try to think up a graphical interface for an object oriented
language. When i'm done doing that i will post a message with a link to it.
Then we have something concrete to discuss.
Regards.
MAX M Rasmussen
New Media Director
Private: maxmcorp@inet.uni-c.dk
http://inet.uni-c.dk/~maxmcorp
Work: maxm@novavision.dk
http://www.novavision.dk/
This is my way cool signature message!!