>I don't get it. Greenpeace claims that genetically engineered foods are a
>big risk to humans yada yada ya, but nowhere do they site specific risks to
>humans. I went to there site and read their stuff on the evils of genetic
>engineering and I was unimpressed. Seems more reactionary than anything.
>Properly applied and tested genetic engineering can offer a wealth of
>benefits to humanity.
>
>I would think they would be in favor of it. Fewer pesticides, more
>efficient usage of farmland, and a cleaner ecosystem all seem to me
>to be Greenpeace type goals.
IAN: Exactly. No more problems => no more Greenpeace
=> no more "need" for more and more government control.
************************************************************************
IAN GODDARD <igoddard@erols.com> Q U E S T I O N A U T H O R I T Y
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VISIT Ian Goddard's Universe -----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________________________