Re: Buckminster-Fullerene

Sarah Marr (
Mon, 02 Sep 1996 11:11:03 +0100

At 19:08 01/09/96 -0700, Forrest Bishop wrote:
>You wrote:
>>[re BMFullerene]
>check out the Elctrochemical Society's Fullerene Group at

Thanks. I'll do that.

>>[R. Artym ]Is there any reason to suspect that the electric field is at all
>>interesting beyond the normal bonding distances? I haven't seen it
>>discussed anywhere. What sparked your interest in this, Sarah?
>To compute resonances of caged neutal atoms perhaps?
>There is some work on attaching ancillary structures to C60 or C70,
>which may lead to methods of attracting and trapping selected atoms
>or small molecules ( e. g. heavy metals). The electric field structure
>is central here.

Verrry clever, Meester Beeshop, but not quite cleverr eenough...

Actually, yeah, it is something along those lines. If anybody comes across
on this please let me know.


Sarah Kathryn Marr