> Absolutely: I think I mentioned elsewhere in my post that I interpret
> 'unlimited' as a 'self-limited', but see it as very open to
> misinterpretation.
IAN: Now I see what you ment. With that stipulation UIF does not run
into the 'running over other's boundaries' problem. Of course then
things get a little more complex than necessary, hence Natasha's
conclusion seems to be the logical default.
> They are good points, but they were made by Peter Voss,
> not Rich Artym.
IAN: Wuups -- sorry to steal your thunder Peter.
**********************************************************************
IAN GODDARD <igoddard@erols.com> FREEDOM: to have it, give it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit Goddard's Universe --> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/home.htm
______________________________________________________________________