Re: infectious vs oxidative stress theory of AIDS
Thu, 2 Dec 1999 22:30:04 EST

In a message dated 12/2/99 12:09:15 PM Central Standard Time, is rumored to have written regarding the following quote;

> > Then could you kindly provide the reference to the paper
> > that shows the scanning electron micrographs of
> > the banded viral isolate. "Show me the money".
> Such mote-in-your-brother's-eye arguments are a common tactic of
> creationists and other crackpots, including the "HIV is not AIDS"
> crowd.

and furthermore he says...

>that the HIV family of viruses, spread by exchange of bodily fluids,
>cause AIDS. If you're not infected, you won't get the disease.
>Millions of confirmations of this should not be upset by a few unusual
>cases that will be expected in any investigation. Anyone who claims
>otherwise has an agenda that they value more than the truth.

I've been following this thread with great interest. Sadly I have no particular credentials to back up anything that I can say regarding it....other than what I've read and what I've seen. one gentle man once said .."Methinks he protests too much".

It's been my experience that when the personal integrity of the opponent is questioned then it's a bad sign for the side doing the questioning. It makes me wonder how strong their case is.

I've read the book by Micheal Fumonto <sp?> years ago...."The myth of Heterosexual Aides"....and I've followed some of the reasoning put forth by James P. Hogan (yes...he DOES write SF....I happen to like SF)....with great interest. So far as I've seen noone has refuted their arguments.

They HAVE however resorted to namecalling and mudslinging..

Still in Albq. NM.