Re: Is lifespan following Moore's Law (ie: increasing exponentially)?

Wed, 13 Oct 1999 13:29:16 +0200

It appears as if John Clark <> wrote:

|Unfortunately nothing else is following Moore's Law, if something else
|was you wouldn't have to ask, it would be impossible to overlook.
|That's not to say other things are not exponential, but they're much
|further back toward the flatter part of the curve than Moore is.

One can argue that many processes, both ``natural'' and human-made, follow the Moore's Law, but with different coefficient values.

E.g. human population size.