Re: E-prime -an interesting article.

M. E. Smith (mesmith@rocketmail.com)
Mon, 11 Oct 1999 14:43:56 -0700 (PDT)

Molloy went on to respond to the sentence:

"A fetus is a human.".

His response was redundant in that he used arguments already well known in the E-prime issue. He did not respond to my point that someone could just as easily say:

"A fetus has the same rights as a human.",

my obvious point being that by shifting to E-prime, the argument has not changed very much, hardly at all. So, again, the value of advocating E-prime seems questionable.

There, that was all in E-prime... Woops! Darn!



** *** ***** ******* ***********
M. E. Smith
mesmith@rocketmail.com
http://members.home.net/mesmith/
** *** ***** ******* ***********

Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com