Matt Gingell writes:
> I find the notion that there exists some universal 'language of mind'
> encoding system underlying cognition extremely implausible. It seems
> idiosyncratic. If everyone's high-level codes are different, the
> prospects for wire-to-brain interfaces seem bleak.
Since you need nano anyway (interfacing is very difficult otherwise), you can of course map the structures, and create user-specific translators, which communicate in common code (OpenGL for artificial reality, so to speak).
Of course if you have nano you don't need such crude things, but in theory it is a possibility.