Eliezer S. Yudkowsky wrote:
>Of late, the opinion has been expressed that it's okay to believe
>strongly in something as long as you have evidence for it - in other
>words, "dogma" describes a belief that is held strongly in the absence
>of evidence. I disagree. Any strong belief is a chain. ...
>Any strong belief causes the opinion to persist in and of itself and
>slows reaction to new information. Translation: It makes you stupid
Bayesian decision theory gives a nice account of how one's degree of belief in some claim should vary as evidence accumulates. It allows for assigning probabilities close to one when the evidence is strong. I presume you mean something else by "strong belief."
firstname.lastname@example.org http://hanson.berkeley.edu/ RWJF Health Policy Scholar FAX: 510-643-8614 140 Warren Hall, UC Berkeley, CA 94720-7360 510-643-1884