> Let me try one more time: _Why are you positing that there's only one
> source?_ How did we get to that point?
> Can't you see that you're trying to argue by simply assuming your
> conclusion? You've offered nothing so far but unsupported assertions.
> Reread the first three lines of this post.
No matter how many times I read them, they still say nothing.
Ok, Joe, I give up. Your opacity has overwhelmed me. It's obvious you're not interested in a rational discussion, since your "arguments" are all variations on the same empty claim.