Re: Surveillance Technology
Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:33:11 -0800 (PST)

Peter C. McCluskey [] wrote:
>This appears to allow the resistance to survive in a continually
>decreasing area of low surveillance, but there's no obvious way for
>the resistance to increase it's territory.

You're assuming the resistance will be passive. If the surveillance freaks back us into a corner we'll just nuke 'em.