Re: Free will (was: Re: Nucleus Accumbens Transplant)

Joe E. Dees (jdees0@students.uwf.edu)
Tue, 8 Dec 1998 00:27:44 -0600

From:           	"John Clark" <jonkc@worldnet.att.net>
To:             	<extropians@extropy.com>
Subject:        	Re: Free will (was: Re: Nucleus Accumbens Transplant)
Date sent:      	Tue, 8 Dec 1998 00:53:39 -0500
Send reply to:  	extropians@extropy.com

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Michael Lorrey <retroman@together.net>
>
> >My only question to those who simultaneously believe in many worlds, while also believing
> >in conservation of mass and energy: Where does all of the mass and energy come from? Many
> >Worlds talks about whole new universes splitting off all the time. Where is the mass and
> >energy for these universes coming from?
>
> If there are an infinite number of universes then mass and energy are still conserved,
> Infinity +1 = Infinity. If the number is only astronomical then either the conservation laws
> are not true at the largest scale or the number of universes is constant, if a universe splits
> off then someplace else two universes merge.
>
> John K Clark jonkc@att.net
>

Extropists, who presumably also well know the Law of Entropy, should know that the chances of two separate universes independently achieving the atom-for-atom relative locational identicality required for seamless merging (if even then it would be possible - something about two things in the same spacetime) is incalculably less than the chances of a single bifurcation allowing for one to split into two of them; therefore to assert that for each one that splits, two would merge seems to violate statistical laws. Joe
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.5
>
> iQA/AwUBNmy+49+WG5eri0QzEQKWvgCgpO67O1vWZTtvkaoX4Z4jrYs83OsAoOxi
> ojNN9XO5tLNSBtp8m91fJs+B
> =ZTS6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>