The paragraph in which you first described this work did not
use terms like "presenting an hypothesis"; it used terms like
"comprehensive", "explanation", and "answers the question..."
If she presents a good hypothesis and shows some evidence for
it, that's great. If she claims what you said she claims in
your first post, then she's a crackpot.
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC