Re: Re: Re: Evidence: Open vs. Closed Universe
Bradley Graham Weslake (bgw03@uow.edu.au)
Wed, 26 Nov 1997 16:58:40 +1100 (EST)
>
> In a message dated 11/25/97 10:58:59 PM, you wrote:
>
> <<> Epistemologically there are zero reasons for believing a closed
> > universe is even possible.
>
> Epistemologically? Why is there no reason for believing in a closed
> universe for *epistemic* reasons?
> >>
>
> Any conceptualization of a closed universe(hold your favorite version
> of a closed universe in your mind right now) is subject to the infinite
> regress fallacy.
>
> Estacado
>
Could you explain this please? I am not educated in the area of Infinite
Regress Fallacy.
--
transient@mindless.com