Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?

byteboy (byteboy@simons-rock.edu)
Mon, 10 Nov 1997 19:21:05 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Geoff Smith: "Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?"
Previous message: Kennita Watson: "[Fwd: Scientists block menopause]"
Maybe in reply to: byteboy: "MATH: Surreal numbers?"
Next in thread: Michael Lorrey: "Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?"

Thanks for clearing that up for me, I was under the assumption that
surreal numbers had more than one notation for the various different
surreal numbers. Suffice it to say, I missed the mark. Thanks for the
correction.

-byte
www.teknopia.org

Next message: Geoff Smith: "Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?"
Previous message: Kennita Watson: "[Fwd: Scientists block menopause]"
Maybe in reply to: byteboy: "MATH: Surreal numbers?"
Next in thread: Michael Lorrey: "Re: MATH: Surreal numbers?"