Re: FILTERS: Simple solution

CurtAdams@aol.com
Thu, 9 Oct 1997 16:26:32 -0400 (EDT)


In a message dated 10/9/97 11:48:20 AM, YakWaxx@aol.com wrote:

>CurtAdams@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I don't like wasting list space arguing with these folks, but I don't like
>> letting their assertions slip into the archives unchallenged either.
>> Perhaps
>> a good solution would be to revive the classifiers (BASIC, META, etc.)
>
>Why not let only posts with classifiers get through, write this as a foot
note
>at the bottom of the FAQ and if they don't read it, they can't post.

Sound good to me, although I also like the idea of multiple tags. It would
also help me distinguish extropia from spam at-a-glance. Sometimes the
headers for making-life-better nonsense closely resemble those for
making-life-better sense.