On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 Spudboy100@aol.com wrote:
> http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011211/sc/autos_chrysler_fuelcell_dc_1.html
>
> On another matter. Could this boronhydroxide fuel cell be considered a
> 'primary' energy source? This is the same thing as the 'Photochemical
No.
> Advance' string, except it seems even more basic.
>
> Mix water and boronhydroxide into this specialized fuel cell, and zoom
NaBH4. Fuel are white pellets. Not pumpable. After the reaction you've got
a messy sludge. Ugh. Rather gimme hydrogen or methanol.
> you can produce electricity for mobility, or power production. The
> cost would be mining the borax (which I believe is sumptious in
> abaundance, and the development cost for the cell, it self; the
> resolution of borax retrieval, etc..
Um, sodium borohydride is not a mineral.
-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBMTO: N48 04'14.8'' E11 36'41.2'' http://www.leitl.org
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:25 MDT