Re: META: Let's be clear about the ad hominem rule

From: John Clark (jonkc@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Tue Dec 11 2001 - 22:42:30 MST


As I understand it an ad hominem is more than just name calling, it is an appeal to
personal considerations rather than to logic or reason; thus calling a person a
jackass is an ad hominem, but calling said person a jackass and then marshaling
logical arguments showing the individual in question really is a member of the
species Equus Asinus would not be. This doesn't appear to be the intent of the list,
it's be polite no matter what, thus I recommend striking "ad hominem" from list rules
and substituting the more accurate if pedestrian sounding phrase "name calling".

      John K Clark jonkc@att.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:25 MDT