Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:
> > Are we reading the same set of List Rules? I don't see any mention of
> > "Zero Tolerance in the List Rules. I see this:
> > ... Perhaps E. Shaun said something that suggested strict
> > zero tolerance, but that is not in the List Rules.
>
>Indeed. Exponent used the dreaded words, but if that's not
>written into an official policy, then rant withdrawn.
It looks like both Max and Lee are correct on this. I mentioned "zero
tolerance" in the Exponent, but did not write that into the revised list
rules. Consider this both an apology to Lee, and a retraction of the "zero
tolerance" mentioned in Exponent.
That said, the process I mentioned in my earlier posts still rings
true. Ad hominem is *not* allowed on this list, and the list rules
directly reflect that.
Sincerely,
E. Shaun Russell
________________________________________________________
E. Shaun Russell Operations Officer, Extropy Institute
e_shaun@extropy.org http://www.extropy.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~K i n e t i c i z e Y o u r P o t e n t i a l~
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:25 MDT