Re: Thermodynamics [was Re: photochemical advance]

From: Damien Broderick (
Date: Tue Dec 11 2001 - 00:40:45 MST

At 11:22 PM 12/10/01 -0800, Spike wrote:

>Are not atoms perpetual motion machines?

No, because they're not doing any work. And/or you can't extract any work
out of their zero point jitterings and spinnings, which is what I guess you

Damien Broderick

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:25 MDT