Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)

From: Samantha Atkins (
Date: Sun Nov 25 2001 - 01:32:01 MST

John, Randy Smith, et. al.,

For the sake of a little accuracy, since you bring up the past,
I looked up the "immoral cur" post. Here is the snippet. As
you can see, I did not practice any ad hominem in this remark.

--- replay from 10/07/01 ---

> >We ultimately did it because we could get away with it
> A keen grasp of the obvious. The good thing is we can and well get away
> with even more.

I don't think I want to speak to anyone who takes that opinion
in such matters of human life and death and international
relations. If that is your attitude then everyone not in your
US club is quite justified in despising you as an immoral curr.
To the extent the US acts inline with your sentiment they would
be quite justified in hatred toward it and in taking any means
they can to strike back. Is that honestly what you want? A war
of all against all until the strongest and perhaps most vile is
the only one left standing?

--- end of replay ------

So it looks like I had nothing there to apologize about. Have a
nice day.

- samantha

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:21 MDT