SUGGEST MORATORIUM ON PERSONAL COMMENTS

From: Michael M. Butler (butler@comp-lib.org)
Date: Thu Nov 22 2001 - 18:43:16 MST


Noisy honesty time from me: Everybody is an asshole sometimes (Strong form of the Dilbert Law).

John Clark + Samantha Atkins + Mike Lorrey + Some people probably on my plonk list / wrote:

<<a lot of heartfelt and deeply held beliefs lubricated with an occasional insult>>

I'm not a cop, nor do I play one in VR. The best government is self-government, nicht wahr?

I see people doing a lot of arguing past each other. I see people who are in tactical mode
arguing with people in strategic mode. I see bald assertions and NOT a lot of actual thinking
going on. I see people reacting. I see setpieces with verdidgris encrustations, to be frank.

Urine and bile can really make a watering hole unpalatable. I've been stepping around the obvious
brackish pools, but maybe since I'm between jobs at the moment I ought to take up the mantle and
be sweetly reasonable until everyone is sick of me and unites against me. :| :)

I understand that feelings run high when survival is at stake. For what it's worth, I think
the "nice guy with an inoperable astrocytoma" model should be reflected on while everyone
takes a time-out on insults. Not all the fingers point outwards.

Something I've been thinking about is a required mail client that delays posting until 48 hours
has passed. But you can't force a person to be reflective (James Bond movies notwithstanding--
that was _superficial_, don't you know).

Consider once more, I beseech you all: is this a private club? Is this an outreach site?
Is righteous indignation the highest level of discourse to be achieved here?

Must an intellect be brittle to be sharp?

Mike,



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:21 MDT