Mike Lorrey wrote:
> Similarly, some are joining in on the war on terrorism in their own
> anarchical ways. The Dispatchers, for instance, who are responsible for
> the Code Red II and Nimda worm attacks of this summer, have openly
> declared war on the Taliban and al Qaeda, among other terror groups.
> Initially, though, they demonstrated their ignorance by attacking
> websites run by the Northern Alliance (who hold the UN seat of
> Afghanistan, not the Taliban).
>
> While internet warfare might be effective against al Qaeda in its
> operations, it is hardly of any concern to the Taliban, who operate no
> internet servers that are publicly known, so they could hardly feel any
> damage by direct attacks. Indirect work, like the impediment of
> financial transfers to and from Taliban supporters, might be a useful
> tactic.
I'd suggest that spoof Al Qaeda websites would be far more practical for
people with those sorts of skills, I can't imagine too many hackers will
be out crashing banks to further the US cause.
Well, they might be trying, but I doubt they have the ability.
Now, if Al Qaeda have no websites, aha! Opportunity knocks!
batchDwayne
man, this post should have echelon quivering.
Um, nuclear. president. that should do it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:14 MDT