Order a copy of the The Merck Manual (from Amazon) and look up the main bio war
agents. It will give you a good idea of when you need to respond.
I did not suggest taking Cipro without the warning signs. In fact I said
that was miss use. My concern is that when you need it, it will not be
available to the average person.
Take a look at:
http://www.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/conditions/10/17/anthrax/
our first bio war attack and the House shuts down for 5 days!!! One minor
event and our elected elites run like rats from a sinking ship. Do you think
if you raised concerns in your office anything would be done except to shut
you up.
I can tell you when I had a IR spec done that showed a highly toxic chemical
in the building I worked in nothing was done to clean it up and everything
was done to shut me up.
Ralph
At 03:42 PM 10/17/2001 EDT, you wrote:
>
>In a message dated 10/17/01 9:52:56 AM, rlewis10us@yahoo.com writes:
>
>>Looks like the establishment doesn't want to protect the population.
>>
>>http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/la-000082833oct17.story
>>
>>rumor has it that elite are taking Cipro as a
>>preventative measure which is
>>a miss use. Check the Merck Manual. But doesn't
>>want the population to have
>>a ready stock in case of wide spread use.
>
>If Cipro reaches the general public, millions of people will take the stuff
>and it will be
>a useless antibiotic in 6 months. We can tolerate a few people taking it.
>
>I don't understand why people are using it. Anybody able to make a
>high-lethality
>strain could breed it to resist Cipro too. It's probably a good time to get a
>part-time job carding wool and try to innoculate yourself with a mild strain
>that
>way.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:14 MDT