Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Sat Dec 23 2000 - 11:15:56 MST


From: "Anders Sandberg" <asa@nada.kth.se>
> (Actually, pancritical rationalism in some sense makes scientific
> foundations at somewhat empirical, but you still have to do some
> philosophical thinking there)

Pancritical rationalism requires rational thinking, not philosophical
thinking.
Otherwise, it should be called pancritical philosophism.

Stay hungry,

--J. R.
3M TA3

=====================
Useless hypotheses: consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind,
free will



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:39 MDT