Re: property is theft; discuss

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Tue Dec 12 2000 - 13:32:00 MST


> To be clear, I am not arguing that property is theft. Rather, I
am
> arguing against the position advanced by Samantha and supported by
Mike,
> that the slogan is self-contradictory and meaningless.
>
> Hal

So, the slogan is not only self-contradictory and meaningless, it is
also indefensible.

Stay hungry,

--J. R.
3M TA3

God, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. Since it doesn't
objectively exist, it is anything you say it is (and nothing at all
at the same time).
--Zero Powers



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:35 MDT