Nicq MacDonald <namacdonald@stthomas.edu>
>a copy is not the original
And the original is not the original, none of the atoms in your body have a
permanent home, everything is in a state of flux.
>The original, "I" , is what I'm concerned about-
You imply that you are "the original I" but I can't imagine why you think that,
you could be a copy made just 60 seconds ago. And anyway who cares,
what difference would it make to your subjective experience if you were,
or were not?
If I have not convinced you it's because you only saw a copy of this post,
you should have seen the original, it was great, you would have been
convinced for sure!
John K Clark jonkc@att.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:33 MDT