**Next message:**GBurch1@aol.com: "Re: Reading lists?"**Previous message:**Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: predictions if wave passed here"**In reply to:**Michael S. Lorrey: "Primitive means of calculating pi, WAS: PI In the Bible"**Next in thread:**John Clark: "Re: PI In the Bible (Oh no! Not again!)"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Michael S. Lorrey" wrote:

*>
*

*> The method used at the time the Bible was written to calculate pi was to divide
*

*> a circle up into little pie slices, then calculate the area of each as if they
*

*> were triangles, instead of as a pie slice with an arc on one leg.
*

What is interesting, is that if you look at this page, at the bottom:

http://www.math.psu.edu/PSUmathhome/courses/maserick/circle/circleapplet.html

You will see a nice handy java applet to calculate pi via the pie slice method.

When you calculate pie to an accuracy of 12 pie slices, pi equals 2.999999999

(i.e. just about exactly 3). Its only when you get up between 256 and 512 pie

slices do you reach four decimal places of accuracy at 3.1415.., and around 4096

slices to reach 3.14159, and 32768 slices to reach 3.1415926.

Now, most numbers used in the bible tended to run in a range between three and a

hundred, with numbers like ten, twelve, etc being prominent. Numbers like 666

were considered 'really big numbers'. I suppose you could say that the bible was

meant to be understood by laymen, not as highly complex texts, and as such would

have been written in the form of 'see spot run' as far as mathematical

complexity was concerned, so using just 12 pie slices to calculate pie seems to

fit. If we are to take it as such, then we should also treat it as the vague,

inaccurate, and detail avoiding text it is, and not something for highly

technological individuals to use to help run their very complex lives. Fine for

kids, but to be put away with other fairy tale books when one matures into

transhumanity.

**Next message:**GBurch1@aol.com: "Re: Reading lists?"**Previous message:**Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: predictions if wave passed here"**In reply to:**Michael S. Lorrey: "Primitive means of calculating pi, WAS: PI In the Bible"**Next in thread:**John Clark: "Re: PI In the Bible (Oh no! Not again!)"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30
: Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:17 MDT
*