Re: Dreadfully sorry, no guarantees from me, was Re: META: Keep the subject lines clean, please!

From: Mike Steven (mikesteven@ndirect.co.uk)
Date: Thu Oct 12 2000 - 08:38:07 MDT


"Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of sXXXch, or the right of
the people peaceably to XXXemble, and to peXXXion the government for a
redress of grievances." :-)
Mike

PS Just finished v1.0 of my homepage, it's fairly basic at the moment, but
any feedback would be much appreciated - particularly wrt the brief "intro
to nanotech" bit: www.mikesteven.co.uk

Alex Future Bokov wrote:
> Well, there are two (algorithmically similar) ways the clean subject lines
> thing can be handled.
>
> 1. The Majordomo software can be configured to bounce messages with
certain
> 'bad' words in them, if the list admins agree.
>
> 2. If the list admins don't agree, somebody can just subscribe a bot to
this
> list, have it replace 'racy' words with X's and forward on messages with
titles
> like...
> "Stuffing XXXXXXXXX up your XXX while smoking XXX and XXXXXXXXXXXX Tipper
Gore"
> ...to that bot's subscribers. Everyone who is a kid (or has kids) and
wants to
> be on a G-rated version of the list can subscribe to the bot. The bot can
> also redirect messages back to the list.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:16 MDT