Date sent: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 17:49:05 -0700 (PDT) From: m <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: violence... To: email@example.com Send reply to: firstname.lastname@example.org
> --- "J. R. Molloy" <email@example.com> wrote:
> > From: Bryan Moss <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > >I bet active hunters tend to live in areas that
> > have low incidences of
> > >criminal behaviour to begin with.
> > Good bet. I'd also bet that areas with low
> > incidences of criminal behavior
> > have high incidences of active hunters to begin
> > with. First come the hunters
> > to new areas, then come the gun laws, then comes the
> > crime.
The most obvious conclusion is that those areas which have enough wilderness to allow hunting have a low incidence of people in general.
> Considering what happenned in the Wild West and any
> number of remote places around the world (where there
> would be hunters) that doesn't stand up.
> After hunters, things tend to develop. Are none of the
> changes from hunting to an urban environment (where
> most of the crime is, at least in total) to be
> It's just gun laws?
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com