Kathryn Aegis wrote:
> During the recent threads on diversity, gender, etc., I have realized how
> many myths exist regarding gender. There is definitely a book in that, a
> hard, skeptical debunking of the Mars/Venus ouvre. (Or at the very least,
> a publishable article.)
On what basis are you going to debunk these myths? And on what grounds do you grant something myth status? I ask because the only tools of attack I can see for this purpose - psychology, statistics, etc - are more confused about the subject than your target misconception.
BM