Re: Zen: Dees - Redundant
Craig Presson (email@example.com)
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 13:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
- Robert Owen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Joe E Dees wrote:
> > Neither this, nor that, nor [neither this nor that], nor [both this and
> > that].
> Not required. The Boolean transform of nor [both this and that] which
> is equivalent to not[this and that] is [not-this or not-that]. But this
> is the inclusive OR, so it includes as a true case [not-this AND not-that].
> But this readily transforms into not[this OR that] or neither this nor that,
> which was explicitly stated.
Yeah, but Nagarjuna lived a long time before Boole and DeMorgan :-)
I use this address only when I am away from home. I have
reply-to set to email@example.com and I read email sent to that
address from here, so please don't use the yahoo address.
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com