Hal Finney wrote:
>
> This sounds correct as far as it goes, but it neglects one crucial aspect
> of quantum computing: getting an answer out of the machine with a large
> probability (or in a large fraction of universes, in the many-worlds
> interpretation).
Got it. No further questions.
--
sentience@pobox.com Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
http://pobox.com/~sentience/AI_design.temp.html
http://pobox.com/~sentience/sing_analysis.html
Disclaimer: Unless otherwise specified, I'm not telling you
everything I think I know.