On Sun, 6 Sep 1998 02:16:59 -0700 "J. R. Molloy" <email@example.com> writes:
>Randall R Randall
>>>Science relies on empirical evidence; religion relies on
>>This one would require some defense, I think.
>Have you read Richard Dawkins?
Some. The problem is that *everything* rests on assumptions, and it is sometimes difficult to defend scientific assumptions over religious ones. The *only* thing that I know of which we can point to is science's track record so far, and that doesn't seem to be very convincing to religionists.
Wolfkin. 5CaaHx/ncmWI7mi94lMRbZ5naWfoiAiWyG37UUfee/P mBLiYDa3JzmUBHnhXeUIAow8NSmb7MywB0pCGjFk 4X/NmYrqIox6sdcw8B7+tGCz4GN0HQuubUvbOC7+o
firstname.lastname@example.org | ICQ: 3043097
E-Gold Acct: 100678 @ www.e-gold.com
On a visible but distant shore a new image of man, The shape of his own future, now in his own hands.
| Johnny Clegg _____________________________________________________________________You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]