Bryan Moss wrote:
>In the second example A and B's communication is
I'm a bit cynical here - this sounds like electronic communism to me...
>filtered (or moderated) to become a useful part of
>the neural net. In the first example the two would
>have to come to some sort of agreement. In the
>second example the decision making process happens
>in the neural net, which is a product of A and B's
>interaction. With a larger network of people,
>communication between the two would join a neural
>net built from the interactions between millions
>of people and a far more complex decision making
>process would take place.
>
O--------------------------------O | Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> | | Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 | | | | Death is for animals; | | immortality for gods. | | Technology is the means by |
O--------------------------------O