Re: [UPLOADING] Is an exact duplicate "me"?

Hara Ra (
Sun, 19 Jul 1998 00:07:41 -0700

>> There's another option here. Instead of bang! make an independent copy,
>> how about making a copy which is connected with the originial with a truly
>> high bandwidth interface. So much so that it is one individual with two
>> bodies. Now, gradually reduce the bandwidth.......
>What would this do? Connecting two copies and then disconnecting them
>seems like it would leave them in their original unconnected state. I'm
>not sure what you're trying to accomplish by doing this. I don't see
>how this relates my statement above.

Which one is "me"? I think this whole debate is nonsense.

| Hara Ra <> | 
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061  |
|                                |
| Death is for animals;          |
| immortality for gods.          |
| Technology is the means by     |

| which we make the transition. |