Hara Ra wrote:
Information theory is not really my field, but the point is that at a
certain level 1) and 2) become identical.
"Well, here we go again...
Information by itself is meaningless. It needs at least two things:
1. A substrate which can store and transmit patterns.
2. An active system which can sense, interpret and create patterns
in the substrate.
Information AND the system which processes it is the fundamental unit here."
"substrate" must itself contain information...but if this is so, then the
substrate requires a substrate, etc etc etc. Your definition is suitable to
the macro world, but falls down if applied to fundamental systems. Again, a
system that can process information must contain information...but then this
system therefore cannot be fundamental. My own intuition is that the
Universe is actually a big lump of instantiated MATH. The math is not so
much a processing system, but a description of the way information CAN
interact with itself. A facile analogy is to throw a bunch of cubes into a
box and start shaking it. Sooner or later the cubes will start lining up.
This is not due to a system "processing" the cubes but simply reflects that
the shape of cubes is such that they can stack neatly in a certain
configuration.
Jonathan Colvin
jcolvin@ican.net
Paraglide Ontario: http://home.ican.net/~jcolvin