Re: META: NSPIC debate? (was Re: NSPIC = Neuro-Semantic

Keith Elis (
Tue, 23 Sep 1997 18:56:47 -0400

Jim Legg wrote:

> To which I
> will with tact rate the discontinuously significant barrier of you being
> a Judas Sheep in betraying others like me to the secret police of the
> META tag on the extropy list.

Uh, I will take responsibility (and credit) for giving Hal's question a

<SNIP something -- I don't know what it was.>

> It's
> therefore important for this debate that you and the rest of the extropy
> list unconditionally surrender all ideas of having money and evaluate
> the replacement of belief in price in order to transcend the illusion of
> price.

What is this ethereal "debate" you keep going on about? If your ideas
are worth considering, then present them. Why all this self-serving

And to get an entire list to unconditionally surrender all ideas of
having money requires some kind of argument last time I checked. Please
quit the hints, allusions, and grandstanding -- bandwidth is valuable.

> If this can't be done the destruction of Ingrid will cause terrible loss
> and retribution.

What the hell are you talking about?

I get the feeling I'm the only one reading any of this stuff.

Not any more.