> To which I
> will with tact rate the discontinuously significant barrier of you being
> a Judas Sheep in betraying others like me to the secret police of the
> META tag on the extropy list.
Uh, I will take responsibility (and credit) for giving Hal's question a
META-tag.
<SNIP something -- I don't know what it was.>
> It's
> therefore important for this debate that you and the rest of the extropy
> list unconditionally surrender all ideas of having money and evaluate
> the replacement of belief in price in order to transcend the illusion of
> price.
What is this ethereal "debate" you keep going on about? If your ideas
are worth considering, then present them. Why all this self-serving
fanfare?
And to get an entire list to unconditionally surrender all ideas of
having money requires some kind of argument last time I checked. Please
quit the hints, allusions, and grandstanding -- bandwidth is valuable.
> If this can't be done the destruction of Ingrid will cause terrible loss
> and retribution.
What the hell are you talking about?
I get the feeling I'm the only one reading any of this stuff.
Not any more.