> Total freedom often means the law of the jungle, were murdering (or at
> least killing) competitors for recources is the smart thing to do.
I think 'often' is a dangerous word to use in this case - have you
any evidence for this? In fact, as argued by Drexler in "Comparative
Ecology: A Computational Perspective"
(http://www.webcom.com/~agorics/agorpapers.html) and a lot of
other results in evolutionary game theory it appears to depend
a lot on what kind of system and payoff matrix we use.
If you become known as a killer, people are less likely to share
resources with you, while they will cooperate against you. Hence
under some circumstances killers and defectors will be less effective
than cooperators.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y