Re: cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message

Paul W. Green (pwg@nanothinc.com)
Sun, 07 Sep 1997 14:26:06 -0700


At 10:32 PM 9/7/97 +0200, you wrote:
>Message is undeliverable.
>Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
> Please retry later.
>Original text follows:
>---------------------
>
>Received: from maxwell.lucifer.com by smtpgate.netcon.co.za (ccMail Link
to SMTP R6.0)
> ; Sun, 07 Sep 97 12:32:20 +0200
>Return-Path: <postmaster@extropy.org>
>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.lucifer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3)
id CAA20078 for extropians-outgoing; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 02:25:04 -0600
>X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.lucifer.com: majordom set sender to
postmaster@extropy.org using -f
>From: adrian_karth_at_netconnect@smtpgate.netcon.co.za
>Message-Id: <9709078736.AA873621188@smtpgate.netcon.co.za>
>X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R6.0
>Date: Sun, 07 Sep 97 10:33:08 +0200
>MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at
aquilla.netcon.co.za
>To: extropians@extropy.org
>MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at
aquilla.netcon.co.za
>Subject: cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="simple boundary"
>Sender: postmaster@extropy.org
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org
>
>Message is undeliverable.
>Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
> Please retry later.
>Original text follows:
>---------------------
>
>Received: from maxwell.lucifer.com by smtpgate.netcon.co.za (ccMail Link
to SMTP R6.0)
> ; Sun, 07 Sep 97 00:32:54 +0200
>Return-Path: <postmaster@extropy.org>
>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.lucifer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3)
id OAA07374 for extropians-outgoing; Sat, 6 Sep 1997 14:10:40 -0600
>X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.lucifer.com: majordom set sender to
postmaster@extropy.org using -f
>From: CurtAdams@aol.com
>Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 16:10:02 -0400 (EDT)
>Message-ID: <970906160958_467259540@emout12.mail.aol.com>
>To: extropians@extropy.org
>Subject: Re: NANO: Lessons learned
>Sender: postmaster@extropy.org
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org
>
>
>In a message dated 9/6/97 6:18:43 AM, sentience@pobox.com (Eliezer S.
>Yudkowsky) wrote:
>
>>I don't think it's time for a consensus yet, especially since we still all
>>disagree, but my own points-in-progress are utterly different from the four
>>mentioned by Nicholas Bostrum.
>>
>>I offer these assertions:
>>
>>1. Given an island vs. sea battle, the sea will win, whether the "island"
>is
>>a malevolent spore or a city.
>
>Hmm. Homo Sapiens apparently started as an "island" of a few thousand
>individual amidst a "sea" of hundreds of thousands of other hominids spread
>throughout the tropical and temperate Old World. We're here and they're
>gone. I can think of many historical examples as well - any modern major
>religion, Rome, the Han Chinese, and Copernican theory proponents, for
>starters. An island can do very well against a sea, particularly if it
>embodies greater intelligence or better use of intelligence.
>
>>2. As the world stands, nanotechnology cannot be freely distributed.
>
>I expect that in its initial appearance, it will be widely distributed. The
>first nanotech will be hard to make and hence many labs, companies,
>foundations, and customers will all have a hand in its creation.
>
>>3. Unintentional gray goo is not a serious problem.
>
>Well, it's trivial next to deliberate destructive goo.
>
>
>

Regards

paul w. green
ceo
nanothinc
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONTACT INFORMATION

NANOTHINC
Sausalito. Ca. 94965. USA

Voice Mail: 1 415 680 1596
Web Site: http://www.nanothinc.com
EMail: pwg@nanothinc.com
Tel: 1 415 927 9557
Fax: 1 415 680 1596
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||