cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message

adrian_karth_at_netconnect@smtpgate.netcon.co.za
Sat, 06 Sep 97 06:34:06 +0200


--simple boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ACSII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Message is undeliverable.
Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
Please retry later.
Original text follows:
---------------------

--simple boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ACSII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: from maxwell.lucifer.com by smtpgate.netcon.co.za (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.0)
; Fri, 05 Sep 97 20:33:56 +0200
Return-Path: <postmaster@extropy.org>
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.lucifer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA27834 for extropians-outgoing; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 10:19:40 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.lucifer.com: majordom set sender to postmaster@extropy.org using -f
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 09:07:55 -0700
From: Hal Finney <hal@rain.org>
Message-Id: <199709051607.JAA04850@crypt.hfinney.com>
To: extropians@extropy.org
Subject: Re: Goo prophylaxis:consensus
Sender: postmaster@extropy.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org

Anders Sandberg writes:
>
> Hal Finney <hal@rain.org> writes:
>
> > I can't imagine a plausible situation in which an entity
> > with the kinds of powers that nanotech confers is going to find itself
> > needing access to information from its biological past. This may be
> > a failure of imagination on my part though. What kinds of things could
> > you see happening where it would need this information?
>
> Art? The tendency to never throw away anything that could someday become
> useful?

Well, that's my question. When would it be useful? How would it be useful?
Give me some ideas of what you're thinking of, here. My conception is that
the Power is so, well, Powerful that I can't see how the historical
knowledge would matter. But most other people seem to disagree, so I'd
appreciate some examples.

Thanks,

Hal

--simple boundary--