Could you please be more specific? What events have occurred in
your forty years of experience in government that cause you to
disagree with Perry's analysis? The four lines that you posted
(after quoting *all* of Perry's post) have no content: they're a
simple assertion of your experience without any details or evidence,
and you might as well have forgone posting them at all for all the
useful information they contain.
Essentially you've informed all of us that you disagree with
Perry, and that's all. Did you relly need to quote every single
line of Perry's post to do that? Do you think that your
informing us that you disagree with Perry did anything to
improve the quality of information being presented to list
subscribers?
-- Eric Watt Forste ++ arkuat@pobox.com ++ expectation foils perception -pcd