Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem

From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@datamann.com)
Date: Sat Sep 29 2001 - 13:40:12 MDT

Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thought problem"
Previous message: Michael Wiik: "religious singularity?"
In reply to: Eugene Leitl: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem"
Next in thread: S.J. Van Sickle: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thought problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Eugene Leitl wrote:
>
>
> Taxing gas guzzlers would seem a smart idea. There's no point in a half of
> ton of steel on wheels to just move one monkey from A to B. Make that
> monkey pay for the privilege.

and just where does it say that such is a priviledge?

Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thought problem"
Previous message: Michael Wiik: "religious singularity?"
In reply to: Eugene Leitl: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem"
Next in thread: S.J. Van Sickle: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thought problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:59 MDT