then of course theres double-tripple dipping wher you encrypt with system A
then encrypt the result with system B and so on
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eugene Leitl" <Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 7:48 AM
Subject: RE: steganography
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Harvey Newstrom wrote:
> > It's <www.outguess.org> not <www.outguess.com>, and I'm perfectly
> > familiar with it. It is a very wonderful program and much more secure
> > than other ones. But don't assume that it is "perfectly" secure.
> Duh. Perfect security is mythical, since infinitely expensive. In real
> world, the bottlenecks lie most assuredly not in the cryptoattack and
> cryptoanalysis region, so there's no point improving things there. You
> have to start with the human factors.
> For all practical purposes, a public binary blob containing state of the
> art steganography will a) never be recognized as such b) even if, the
> strong cryptosystem used will not be broken within a time window counted
> in decades.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:53 MDT