INTERESTING
Subject: The New War-ld Order - America's New War
The New War-ld Order - America's New War
By Richard Sauder, PhD
I suppose it was inevitable that the New World Order would turn out to
actually be the "New War-ld Order". And that George Bush, Jr. would promote
himself to be War-ld Leader. Lord help us.
I want to underscore at the outset that it goes without saying that the
assault on the World Trade Center was horrific. As I watched the plane slam
into the tower, people jumping to their death from hundreds of feet up, and
then both of the towers crumbling, I found myself saying, "How bizarre."
And then, "My God. Thousands of people just died." I was rendered
speechless. The event was so far out of my experience that I watched it in
numb disbelief.
The numbness persists. But in this novocaine-like numbness several
thoughts have kept coming to the fore of my mind. Let me set them out for
you. I ask that you reflect on them soberly. I believe you may see some
truth in what I say -- perhaps a great deal more truth than in the
so-called "official" pronouncements you hear and see in the major news media
outlets these last few days.
1) This was an extremely sophisticated operation. More than one observer
has mentioned its almost military efficiency --as if it had the backing of
a well-oiled intelligence machine behind it. My question: was a well-oiled
intelligence machine behind it? Are we seeing a massive intelligence
operation, with considerable resources behind it? Are we really to believe
that one man in a turban on the other side of the planet is the major
driving force behind this? Or might the source of this very sophisticated
conspiracy lie much closer to home, right in the United States itself? As I
recall, bin Laden got his start as an indirect (or was it direct?)
CIA-asset, as a mujahadin warrior fighting against the Soviet Army during
their abortive 10-year invasion of Afghanistan. Question: is bin Laden still
a CIA-asset today? Does the CIA use him and his followers as a mercenary
force on "cut-out" operations where they need "plausible deniability"? Like
say, for a massive, staged-for-TV terrorist operation on American soil?
Don't lash out at me for posing the question. THINK.
2) I have read that the plane that struck the Pentagon first flew
toward/near/over the White House, before veering away and over the Potomac
to the Pentagon. The White House has defenses for PRECISELY this type of
event. Why were they not activated? Was the plane expected? Or did it
receive other, um, flight instructions en route? THINK.
3) The White House issued a statement saying that there was "credible
evidence" that the hijackers had access to secret codes and information
concerning the presidential jet, Air Force One, such that George Bush, Jr.
fled first to Louisiana and then to Nebraska, before returning to
Washington, DC at the end of the day. If this statement is true, then that
presupposes that this attack may have roots that extend into the most secret
levels of the Executive branch of the United States government. Those codes
are very closely held. I don't have them and neither do you. Yet we have
been led to believe by the Bush White House that the hijackers somehow may
have had them. How is this possible? Could the conspiracy extend into the
Federal Government itself? (It occurs to me that the White House's
assertion that the hijackers had access to TOP SECRET codes might also be
false, in order to make George Jr.'s day on the run appear less, shall we
say, cowardly, and more, er, presidential. If so that would then call the
truthfulness of other statements and pronouncements made that same day into
question. So -- we are ineluctably faced either with deceit and lies by the
White House, or with a conspiracy that may reach very deep indeed into the
United States government itself-- or maybe both!) THINK.
4) Are we looking at some kind of coup d'etat in progress? Look at the
two major targets that were hit: the nerve center of the American military
(The Pentagon) and the nerve center of the American economy (Lower
Manhattan). You know, in many other countries, if the national military
headquarters and major financial centers were massively bombed at the same
time it would be instantly understood that there was possibly a coup d'etat
underway, with rival factions within the military and the business elite
vying for control. But not in the USA. Nope. This is the land of the
"lone-nut-conspiracy". Where any complex matter, no matter how intricate
and sophisticated it may be gets reduced to "one lone nut". It usually
takes only a matter of hours. And, yep, sure enough: one lone nut. Osama bin
Laden. But not just any lone nut, this bin Laden character. No, he happens
to have had indirect (or were/are they direct?) ties to the CIA. Hmmm.
Let's seeÖ Lee Harvey Oswald also had ties to the CIA. You don't suppose
that could just be a coincidence, now do you?
5) One day when I was doing my graduate studies one of my professors who
worked for the CIA told me, "Earlier in my career, I used to help overthrow
governments." I am sure he told the truth. This is what the CIA has been
doing for decades. In Guatemala, Iran, ChileÖ the list continues. You know
how the old saying goes: "Practice makes perfect." THINK.
6) Usually when a coup d'etat (or attempted coup d'etat) occurs you will
see certain kinds of actions take place. Daily life will be disrupted.
There will be troops and armored personnel carriers in the Capital city
immediately afterward. This happened in Washington, DC. There will be a
security crack-down with increased police surveillance and arbitrary arrest
and detention. Sure enough, just yesterday, I read that the FBI has
increased its surveillance of the internet, and that the U.S. Senate has
voted to increase federal telephone tapping authority. Also, the news has
been full of stories of people being arrested and detained here and there
around the country-- usually men of Middle Eastern, Muslim or Arab ancestry
or origin. (One is reminded somewhat of the scapegoating of Jews in the
Third Reich.) There will also be restrictions on free movement. We also
have seen this in the present confusion, with restrictions on air travel
and the searches and arrest of passengers on Amtrak. All of this is done in
the name of greater security and safety. But what if the foxes are within
the flock, and not without? What is occurring has a very strange feel to
it. THINK.
7) Everywhere I go I see flags. I read of a crowd of workers at the
World Trade Center spontaneously chanting "USA, USA, USA, USA" in unison
when Bush visited. And I thought: this Bush man will lead these Unthinking
American Sheeple to their uncomprehending deaths. And most astonishingly of
all: in their thousands they will go willingly, never understanding how
they are manipulated and led to the slaughter.
8) It reminds me that one of the techniques the CIA-mind controllers
used in the MK-Ultra mind control program was called "psychic driving". It
turns out that if you induce massive emotional trauma into the human psyche
that it makes it highly suggestible and mentally programmable. That is, you
shatter the normal psyche with emotional trauma and while it is in a
vulnerable, shattered condition you insert the new mental program you want
the person to embody and carry out. When the psyche recovers from the
trauma, when the psyche establishes a new emotional equilibrium, it is,
however, radically changed: it has incorporated the new thoughts, the new
way of thinking and acting that the mind controller presented to it when it
was shattered. When it reconstitutes itself it incorporates the mind
control program as part of its emotional/psychological/mental constitution.
I suggest that we are seeing a massive mind control operation to insert a
WAR program into the hearts and souls of Americans and as much of the rest
of the world as possible. THINK.
9) For all of the foregoing reasons and more I want to say just as
plainly and publicly as I can that I am OPPOSED to this coming war. It
cannot possibly have a good result. To avenge 5,000 victims (or 20,000?)
America may very well kill even more, perhaps a great deal more, many of
whom will be just as innocent as the victims of last week's attacks. I have
read that the Pentagon will employ its entire arsenal in the coming
conflict. That is sobering. That would include everything, up to and
including, nuclear weapons. If the USA uses nuclear weapons, can anyone
reading this doubt that those against whom they are used will strike back
in return? And if an American city is nuked-- what then? Does the Pentagon
then nuke back in return? And if so, do those who are nuked, nuke America
yet again? And so forthÖ. where would it end? THINK.
10) I am deeply troubled by the anti-Arab, anti-Muslim hysteria of
recent days. I have read of attacks against mosques and harassment of Arabs
and Muslims in the streets. Remember the NAZIs' Kristallnacht? Where the
German people went on a rampage against Jews and their synagogues in the
run-up to World War II? Must we behave like the NAZIs did? I would suggest
that such behavior is profoundly un-American. Let me say that over the years
I have known several Arabs and Muslims. They were my friends and associates,
and I liked them. I even studied Arabic for one year. I submit that we need
greater understanding of the Arabic and Muslim worlds -- not less. Perhaps
if we understood more, we would hate less.
11) Chickens coming home to roost. See Point 5 above. The CIA and the
Pentagon have violently intervened, directly and indirectly, all over the
world, time and time again. The aggregate civilian casualties run to the
MILLIONS. Here is just a partial list: Guatemala, Panama, Chile, Colombia,
El Salvador, Nicaragua, Haiti, Grenada, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia,
Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Angola, Liberia, Serbia, Kosovo Ö. and
the list keeps on going and going. If America thought it could just send in
the Marines, send in the CIA-covert operations guys and assassination teams
and stomp on the peasantry here -- and there -- and everywhere -- and no
one would ever strike back-- well, that simple-minded delusion may have
just ended with a very big bang in New York.
12) And would the CIA and others, like the ultra-rich Bush family and
its Big Oil cronies and World Bank friends, who want to impose a fascist
global order, play off violent factions in the Arab and Muslim world
against the civilian population in America in order to annihilate the
first, while further enslaving the second? DUH! -- Do yah think maybe?
13) Enslaving the population of America. In the headlines recently: A)
Increased telephone wire tapping by the FBI. B) Increased surveillance of
the internet and e-mail by the FBI's CARNIVORE program. C) Prominent
arrests and detentions of travelers on trains and planes-- some are
released; others are held. Will you be next? Are you sure about that? D)
Politicians talking about giving up some of the freedoms we have become used
to in order to have greater security-- presumably things like the 4th
Amendment-- the right to be secure from police intrusion, harassment, and
surveillance within the sphere of our personal lives and homes? E)
Increased use of biometric identification by banks, airports and government
bureaucracies-- retina scans, palm print scans, digitized photo data banks
used by crowd-scanning cameras. F) Massive surveillance of global
electronic communications by the NSA's ECHELON program.
Right. Society itself is now a huge open air prison and we are all
inmates in the "Federal Penitentiary". Don't lash out at me for stating the
plain facts. Just please THINK.
In conclusion:
I listened to George Bush, Jr. on the radio. He talked about "ridding
the world of evil". And in the instant that he said those words I
understood the depths of the danger that we all face, because I understood
that this man has a huge messiah complex. He has a classic "big man-little
man" psychological profile and he's out to save the world from "evil". And
that is dangerous, very dangerous indeed. Because he and other political
and military figures have plainly said that they will unleash the massive
force of the Pentagon's huge arsenal in a global campaign against terrorism
that will be wide ranging and long term. The better to defend America's
cherished "freedom" and protect America against further harm. The war will
be prosecuted relentlessly, at home and abroad. Who precisely are the
"enemies"? Well, we haven't exactly been told that just yet.
But "they" are out there and also right "here" in America!-- dangerous,
amorphous, hard to identify, slippery, cunning. Perhaps even your next door
neighbor! Gasp! (Will the federal cops start kicking in doors at 3:00am
like the Gestapo used to do during the Third Reich-- to apprehend alleged
"enemies" of the state in their pajamas?) So the U.S. government has made
something like a declaration of war -- open-ended, ongoing, with an initial
$40 billion slush fund to wage it. And the war has already started-- there
is already an adversary, even if no one can yet say with precision just who
the "enemy" is.
I believe there is every possibility that in George Bush, Jr.'s crusade
to "rid the world of evil" that he just may end up unleashing even more
evil, both overseas and in the United States of America. So I am OPPOSED to
this "New War-ld Order".
Finally, there is the piddling little matter that when "Jr." was faced
with his first Presidential crisis his first instinct was to run and
run...as fast and as far as his official airplane could carry him...he ran
first to Louisiana...and then he ran some more to Nebraska...and then he
came slinking home at the end of the day. Translation: when the sloppy stuff
hits the fan, he and other (so-called) "leaders" will scurry to their
underground bunkers and surround themselves with their Praetorian guards
and leave you to face the violence all alone with your bare hands.
Your (so-called) government hard at work.
Please THINK.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:52 MDT