Damien Broderick <email@example.com> writes:
> At 10:40 PM 9/18/01 -0700, samantha wrote:
> >I think it is more of a young and bloody culture wrenched into the 20th
> >kind of problem.
> I keep seeing this attempted explanation. If it means that Islam itself is
> `young', feeling its oats, you have to wonder why even later ideological
> systems are not all frothing at the mouth with unchecked rage and
> missionary zeal. Some have, of course; some have been restrained.
> Islam is 1400 years old. Islam was already old long before anyone spoke
> English. Some 55 generations. This is *not* `young'.
It isn't about Islam. It is about many Arab countries developmental levels before
being wrenched into this century. Islam actually helped civilize them relative
to what they were before. Of course a fair argument can be made that the Turks
actually did more to add some of the nastier elements to Islam, especially the
subjugation of women. But that's another topic altogether.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:52 MDT